|
Shambhala Sun
Feminine Principal

The principal figure in Buddhism is the teacher, a role traditionally dominated by men. ANDREA MILLER profiles three women teachers — TRUDY GOODMAN, ROSHI PAT ENKYO O'HARA, and LAMA PALDEN DROLMA — who are changing the face of Buddhism and making the teachings whole.
In a hospital room in Buffalo, New York, Trudy Goodman had a spiritual experience she had no way to understand.
Goodman
was only twenty-one at the time, and her then husband was not much
older. So young, so inexperienced, they knew nothing about childbirth.
While she was wracked by con- tractions, he felt helpless and started to
read. But it was incongruous—his book, her pain. Goodman lost her
patience and told her husband to leave. For the next four hours, she
labored alone. Only a nurse checked in on her every hour or so.
In
her aloneness, in her intense pain, Goodman discovered a “pinnacle of
nowness,” she says. It was vast. It was deep. It was her realizing her
connection to every being who had come before and to every being who
would ever follow.
Two
years later Goodman was in a hospital in Geneva, Switzerland, with her
university professor who was dying. There were six doctors crowded
around the tiny, sick body in the bed, and Goodman found herself
experiencing another profound opening. After that she started searching
for answers, delving into the teachings of mystics and yogis. “They’d
say, ‘Eat artichokes,’ ” she tells me, “they’d say this and that.” But
it never felt right. Then her childhood friend Jon Kabat-Zinn invited
her to a talk by the Korean Zen master Seung Sahn.
“That first time I heard him speak, I saw that he knew what I knew and he knew what I needed to know,” says Goodman.
It
was something in his eyes, rather than anything he said. “In fact,” she
continues, “Seung Sahn spoke Pidgin English. He said, ‘The sky is blue,
the grass is green.’ Real simple Zen talk, but I remember crying. Just
weeping with relief, feeling like I’d come home. That’s how I met the
dharma.”
Today,
more than three decades later, Trudy Goodman is the founder and guiding
teacher of InsightLA, a community in Los Angeles that offers daily
sitting groups, weekend retreats, and a variety of Buddhist and secular
mindfulness classes. She’s committed to making meditation practice
available to people with busy, urban lives, but without turning the
practice into what she calls “McMindfulness.” As she describes it, her
teaching style is “Vipassana with a strong Zen flavor.”
When
Goodman began studying the dharma in the 1970s, there were very few
women Buddhist teachers. Among prominent teachers a gender imbalance
still exists today, yet it is cause for celebration that here in the
West, women are increasingly taking their place at the podium. Some
Buddhists claim that to emphasize the importance of women teachers is to
genderize the dharma. They believe that the dharma is the dharma and,
therefore, it doesn’t matter if it’s a man or a woman teaching it. But
if gender doesn’t matter, then why shouldn’t there be more women
teachers? Why have women been excluded? As scholar Rita Gross has said
of the work of Buddhist feminists,“We’re not genderizing the dharma.
We’re un-genderizing it. The dharma was genderized thousands of years
ago when women were first put in a separate class.”
The
Buddha praised his female students for their wisdom and founded an
order of nuns. Yet after his death, when a council of five hundred
arhats (perfected saints) gathered to establish the Buddhist canon, not
one arhati (female arhat) was among them. Over the millennia there have
been women teachers, but seeking them out is like seeking scraps. While
Buddhism’s male ancestors fill lists, in each tradition there are only a
handful of known female ancestors.
Buddhist
culture, however, is not static. It changes with each culture it
encounters. India, China, Tibet, Vietnam—the role of Buddhist women has
shifted according to place and time, and it has shifted again while
taking root in the West. When Buddhism came to America in the 1960s and
’70s, it encountered the bur-geoning movement of second-wave feminism.
People—both women and men, both Western and Asian—began questioning
power dynamics within sanghas. They began working to make chants and
liturgy gender neutral, to call for female ordinations where they had
previously been denied, and to encourage women to assume leadership
roles. Today in the West one of the most celebrated Buddhist teachers is
a woman—Pema Chödrön—and there are a host of others who are likewise
making a significant contribution to the dharma. Among them are Trudy
Goodman, Roshi Pat Enkyo O’Hara, and Lama Palden Drolma.
Trudy
Goodman’s heart teacher was Maurine Stu-art, one of the first female
Zen masters in the United States and also a mother of three, a concert
pianist, and a piano teacher. “Maurine had a full, balanced life,” says
Goodman. “She modeled that it’s possible to do intensive spiritual
practice while living as a laywoman and still do your hair and joke
about new lipstick. I loved her and did very deep practice with her.”
It
was important to Goodman to have a woman teacher because, although
she’d been immediately drawn to Buddhism and what she believed was its
profound vitality and clarity, she had nonetheless felt that the
teachings she’d been receiving from men didn’t relate enough to the
things that ordinary women like her really cared about. Things, says
Goodman, like “our work in the domestic sphere, our relationships, our
family lives, how to balance work and family.”
Goodman
found the teachings that sprang up after the time of the Buddha to be
the most problematic. For instance, meditation instructions for working
with desire became misogynistic over the centuries. The Buddha taught us
to imagine what we’d find if we peeled off our skin—to imagine the red
mess of our blood, liver, kidneys. The idea was that if we mentally
dissect our body, we will cut through our attachment to our own physical
form and by extension to the physical form of others. Later teachers,
however, sometimes gave instructions to imagine the body of a woman
stripped of skin, so it was her disgusting guts revealed, not the male
meditator’s. The view of women as sinful and impure served the monastic
community, says Goodman, because it helped monks maintain their
celibacy.
“It’s
a rich area of practice to look at how our gender and sexual
orientation affect our perceptions and how these perceptions affect our
relationship to the teachings,” Goodman tells me. Very often, she says,
sexuality is outside of our awareness; we compartmentalize it. But we
can look deeply at our thoughts and actions, and our mindful awareness
can encompass our sexual behavior. Do we exempt our sexual fantasies
when tracking the ways that attraction, aversion, ignorance, and
delusion are affecting our practice? How do we integrate our practice
into our relationships? And even when we’re in a celibate phase of our
lives, are we aware of how we react to manifestations of sexual behavior
in art and the media and have we made peace with our own past
behaviors? “I’m
very interested in the integration of sexuality and relationship in
dharma practice,” says Goodman. “A sense of being embodied is harder to
escape for women. We have periods. We give birth. There’s blood and
milk. Our bodies are dynamic and powerful.”
About
two years prior to discovering the dharma, Goodman began undergoing
psychoanalysis. Then she started sitting and was struck by the synergy
between the work she was doing with her analyst and the work she was
doing on the cushion.“They’re both awareness practices,”she says.“In
meditation we focus more on awareness of how the mind works, while in
therapy we also bring attention to the content of our experience.
Sitting and therapy work beautifully together. Together you have a
full-spectrum human being.”
Goodman
was inspired to become a psychoanalyst and worked in that field for
twenty-five years, practicing mindfulness-based psychotherapy even
before it was called that. She also led and attended Buddhist retreats
and in the process noticed a pattern emerge. On the Monday after a
retreat, she’d go back to her office and all her clients would have an
opening or breakthrough in their therapy. She says: “At first I thought,
wait a minute, how can this be? But it happened over and over. There
was no question that when I became freer inside, it allowed everyone who
consulted with me to step into that freedom and benefit. I wasn’t
practicing just for me.”
Goodman
has practiced Theravada, Zen, and Vajrayana and, according to her,
early Buddhism, or the Theravada tradition, contains everything that you
find in the later teachings of Zen and Vajrayana. “Early Buddhism has
it all,” she says. From the koans of Zen to the dzogchen practices of
Vajrayana, the same principles are expressed in different forms, with
certain things emphasized more or less. She concludes: “I’ve experienced
a lot of joy at seeing the creativity and cultural sensitivity of each
tradition.”
Roshi
Pat Enkyo O’Hara is the abbot of the Village Zendo, located in the
heart of Manhattan. “If you come to sit with us early in the morning,
it’s very quiet,” says O’Hara. “Then it gets very noisy, and you are
never not aware that you are in the middle of one of the biggest cities
in the world. When you step out onto Broadway, there are droves of
people walking up and down the street—some happy, some sad. You know
you’re a part of this vast, interconnected universe, and you’re aware of
your responsibility in the world. I think that’s one of the reasons we
at the Village Zendo are so socially engaged.”
In
1986, O’Hara co-founded the zendo with her partner, Barbara Joshin
O’Hara. The couple had been practicing at Zen Mountain Monastery in the
catskills but they wanted a place to sit in the city as well. So it
wasn’t “a center” per se that they set out to establish, just a
community of people who would support each other in their practice.
Nonetheless, the community grew exponentially and O’Hara’s teachers
encouraged her to make it a more formal center. O’Hara complied. Yet, in
terms of organiza- tional structure, the original flavor of the sangha
has remained. The sangha began as a community effort and this is still
true. That’s not to say, however, that the Village Zendo is without
leaders and decision makers; all organizations need these roles
fulfilled in order to function, and the zendo is no exception. O’Hara is
the head teacher, but five other teachers work closely with her on
teaching strategy, and each teacher—including O’Hara—has just one vote.
“I respect them and they respect me,” she says. But “they can vote me
down—and have.” The zendo also has a democratically run executive
committee and a board to deal with the administrative functioning. This
relatively flat organizational structure reflects O’Hara’s political
philosophy. Before
she practiced at Zen Mountain Monastery, O’Hara went to several
Buddhist centers that made her uncomfortable. They were too
hierarchical, too sober, too restricted. “In various communities you
have the people in power and the people not in power,” she explains. Of
course women are not the only ones adversely affected by these dynamics.
But, as a woman, O’Hara is sensitive to power differentials and the
damage they can cause. Women are frequently aware of having been pushed
aside and, as such, are sensitized to the issue of power. “I think it
changes the way communities function when there’s female leadership,”
she says. “Male teachers are often the seat of all the knowledge, all
the power, all the talk. You don’t see that so much with women
teachers.”
In
her career as a professor, O’Hara was likewise concerned with power
differentials. For twenty years, she taught at New York University’s
Tisch School of the Arts, where she co-founded a program called
interactive media. At the time of its founding, before the age of the
Internet, it was revolutionary. In the beginning the program focused on
using split-screen televisions as a way for people to talk to each
other.
“The
communication wasn’t one-way,” she says, “and that was the key to a
more horizontal power structure, to elevating a population and putting
it on an equal status with the people in power. One of the first
projects we did was in a little town in Pennsylvania, where we connected
all the senior citizen centers to the mayor’s office. Then once a week
the seniors would interview the mayor and it would go out on the cable
system for the whole county.”
Later
O’Hara worked with other marginalized populations, including kids in a
drug treatment center to whom she taught videography. For people with
drug issues, particularly those dealing with addiction to crack and
other hard narcotics, the ability to pay attention has been eroded. In
order to interview one another or to hold a camera, O’Hara’s young
students first needed a certain level of attention, and so she taught
them meditation. They started with a minute or two of trying to follow
the breath and built up from there—the incentive of getting to use the
camera keeping them going. “I loved that project,” says O’Hara. “In the
beginning the kids just talked. They didn’t know how to do an
interview.” But in the end they learned to listen to one another.
Another
major element of O’Hara’s work at NYU was to mentor new artists—to help
students enrolled in the school to develop their voice in media. Today
mentoring continues to be important to her. Her focus has shifted,
however, to nurturing a new generation of Buddhists engaged in social
issues. One example is that she is the spiritual director of the New
York Zen Center for Contemplative Care (NYZCCC), a non-profit that
offers a Buddhist chaplaincy Program and provides direct care to the
sick and dying.
Koshin
Paley Ellison, a co-founder of NYZCCC, has a deep appreciation for
O’Hara’s patience with people, process, and unfolding. He says, “Over
the past two decades, she’s taught me a lot about trust—trusting that
each person will find their practice, that each person will find where
they need to go.”
The
essence of contemplative care is being with someone where they are and
not trying to get them to change. “One of the huge struggles that many
of our beginning chaplaincy students have is feeling like they need to
‘do’ something,” Ellison continues. “They feel the need to fix somebody.
They need to get busy. But Roshi O’Hara’s teaching is not about that.
It’s about being with the moment in an unadorned way. It’s learning how
to trust that you are enough. You don’t need to go into a patient’s room
and perform tricks. You just need to show up with your whole body and
mind.”
O’Hara
teaches that the very heart of Zen practice is becoming intimate with
yourself. “Once you really know yourself,” she says, “then,
automatically, you are available to serve the world.”
In
her early twenties, Lama Palden Drolma liked to go to a ramshackle
garden in her Californian neighborhood. There, she’d stand facing a
statue of the Virgin Mary and pray for help in finding her true teacher.
As
long as Drolma could remember, she’d been on a spiritual path. She says
that even at age three she had powerful dreams of her past lives—dreams
that reminded her of her purpose for this lifetime. Growing up, Drolma
was uncomfortable in America. She lived with her family in an affluent
neighborhood in the Bay Area, and on the surface the lifestyle was
picture perfect, yet the beautiful houses and high-powered jobs didn’t
create happiness. In her early teens, Drolma began to feel an intense
spiritual longing. In high school, she studied comparative religion and
in university she delved deeply into Zen, Esoteric Christianity, and
Sufism. Then, when Drolma was twenty-five, a Sufi friend took her to a
talk by the Tibetan Buddhist master Kyabje Kalu Rinpoche, and Drolma
immediately recognized him as her teacher. That night she took refuge
with him and six months later she moved to his monastery in the
Himalayas.
Conditions
there were rough. “If you washed your clothes—which you had to do in
freezing cold water—and then you hung them up in your room, after ten
days they would still not be dry,” she says. The fog was that thick. As
for good food and hot baths, they were a bus-ride away in Darjeeling.
Nonetheless, Drolma barely noticed the hardship. Being with her teacher
made her feel completely at home.
Kalu
Rinpoche often spoke about how religions manifest in different ways,
depending on the culture that gives birth to them, but all in their
essence are reflections of awakened mind. This teaching resonated with
drolma and she relates it to her belief in a universal awakened
feminine. As she puts it, the Virgin Mary, Guanyin, Buffalo Woman, and
Tara are all different faces of this same feminine energy.
In
1982, Drolma began a three-year closed retreat under Kalu Rinpoche on
Salt Spring Island in British columbia. “It was the best, most useful
thing I have ever done in my life,” she says. “It was also extremely
challenging. I had to face the difficulty of my own mind, my own
aspirations, my own negative habitual patterns. Then my younger brother
died and it was excruciatingly hard not to be able to be there with my
family. But the hardest thing about my three-year retreat was that my
son was ten years old at the time. He stayed with my mother and it was
difficult to be apart from him.”
This
sacrifice of not being with her child made Drolma feel like she had to
make the most of her retreat and she practiced with vigor. As a result, a
shift occurred in her; the spiritual longing she’d been feeling since
her teens dissipated. “My heart reconnected with itself in the deepest
way,” she explains. “There wasn’t anything to long for anymore. There
was nothing separate from me spiritually.”
A
year after the completion of the retreat, Drolma was authorized as a
lama, or teacher, making her one of the first Western female lamas in
the Vajrayana Buddhist tradition. She moved to Marin County, california,
and began teaching in her living room. But her students quickly outgrew
the space and in 1996 she founded Sukhasiddhi Foundation, a center
dedicated to the study and practice of Tibetan Buddhism.
“Kalu
Rinpoche authorized some women as lamas who have still never really
taught,” says Drolma. Vajrayana Buddhism is basically still “a boys’
club,” she continues, so it’s intimidating for women to assume teaching
roles. “Women being supported is really a key issue. I think if my
parents hadn’t been supportive of me and Kalu Rinpoche and all my other
teachers hadn’t been 100 percent supportive, I would never have become a
teacher.”
According
to Drolma, there’s a difference between rinpoches who have a lot of
realization and what she calls the “middle management lamas,” who aren’t
as realized and are more culturally bound. The highly realized
rinpoches, such as the Dalai Lama and Kalu Rinpoche, tend to treat women
students with respect and they’re willing to abandon some arguably
sexist traditions. The example Drolma offers from her own experience is
that when she was in the Himalayas there were certain sacred rooms where
women weren’t supposed to go. But the high masters simply said, “Oh,
you can come in,” and they allowed women to live in the monasteries and
study.
Drolma
is grateful for all the support she has received from her male
teachers, but in her opinion women also need women role models; that is,
they need to have women teachers and—even more importantly—to see that
there are women who are highly realized. “My generation,” says drolma,
“found women role models in history, and sometimes in the flesh, but
that was rare.” For women to really feel that it’s possible for them to
attain deep realization in this life, they need to know that there are
women who have awakened before them.
The
Buddha asserted that there is neither male nor female, and ultimately
this is true. Yet on the ground—at the relative level—there are women
and there are men. Beyond just having different bodies, we are
socialized differently and accorded different roles and privileges. In
myriad ways these factors determine how we experience the world and by
extension how we experience the spiritual path. So while both male and
female teachers can speak on the universal human experience, women can
also have a unique perspective that can be helpful to both male and
female students. That’s not to say that women teachers are better than
male teachers or vice versa. There are simply different ways of
expressing the dharma.
Recently,
a man approached Drolma after hearing her teach. He was full of
emotion. After years of studying Buddhism with male teachers, he was
deeply touched by her unique expression of the dharma. She had helped
him finally understand the very heart of the tradition.
Andrea Miller is deputy editor of the Shambhala Sun and the editor of the anthology Right Here with You: Bringing Mindful Awareness into Our Relationships.
|