|
Page 5 of 8
5. Art in Everyday Life
Early
in his time in America, Trungpa Rinpoche was hailing a cab in New York
City. The Beat poet Allen Ginsberg was trying to hail the same cab. They
were introduced, and Trungpa Rinpoche, his wife Diana, Ginsberg, and
his ailing father shared the cab. After dropping off Ginsberg’s father,
they continued to Ginsberg’s apartment, where they stayed up long into
the night talking and writing poetry. In the introduction to Volume
Seven of the Collected Works
(devoted to poetry, art, and theater), editor Carolyn Gimian notes that
this chance meeting started a long and fruitful friendship: “On the
Buddhist front, Rinpoche was the teacher, Ginsberg the student; on the
poetry front, Rinpoche acknowledged how much he had learned from
Ginsberg, and Ginsberg also credited Trungpa Rinpoche with considerable
influence on his poetry.” Rinpoche
had received training in Tibetan poetics, where the metrical forms were
well established and the topics restricted to the spiritual. Ginsberg
was a worldly poet, composing in a freeform style. Yet he shared
Rinpoche’s deep appreciation of classical forms, believing that learning
strict meter allows one to have good rules to break. Poetry became an
arena in which Rinpoche could play, and display a sense of humor. For
him, humor meant not jokiness, but seeing the dichotomies and the
totality at once, which allowed one to play—with one’s communication,
with one’s perceptions, with one’s gestures. It evinced real freedom. TIMELY RAIN
In the jungles of flaming ego, May there be cool iceberg of bodhichitta. On the racetrack of bureaucracy, May there be the walk of an elephant. May the sumptuous castle of arrogance Be destroyed by vajra confidence. In the garden of gentle sanity, May you be bombarded by coconuts of wakefulness. Trungpa
Rinpoche saw art and the arts not as diversions to give one relief from
the serious side of life, nor as something for an elite who could
afford the time and money. He spoke of “art in everyday life,” that life
could be lived artfully. Our speech, our movements, our gestures, our
craftsmanship, can be carried out with grace, not self-consciously as a
performance, but intrinsically as part of our being—and as an outgrowth
of meditation. In fact, he felt that art and artistry emerged from the
space of meditation: Beethoven,
El Greco, or my most favorite person in music, Mozart—I think they all
sat. They actually sat in the sense that their minds became blank before
they did what they were doing. Otherwise, they couldn’t possibly do it. From
early on, he played in many realms: film, theater, song, photography,
painting, calligraphy, flower arranging. In 1974, he founded the Naropa
Institute (now Naropa University) as a place where an artistic
sensibility could be an integral part of higher education. Education at
Naropa, he said, would marry intellect and intuition. As Gimian points
out, in the Japanese notion of do, or way—as in chado, the way of tea, or kado, the way of flowers— he saw a model for how secular activities of all kinds could become paths to awakening. Drawing
on formal training in flower arranging, he used it as a means to convey
certain principles, such as heaven, earth, and human—with heaven
representing open space, earth the ground, and human that which joins
the dichotomy. In theater, he created exercises that helped actors
engage the space around them, coming to know relaxation by knowing
tension. In visual arts, he explored the process of perception, the
interplay between the investigating mind that looks and the big mind
that sees. These teachings formed the basis for a program called dharma
art, which used simple exercises like arranging objects to help students
go beyond the limits of perception based on ego’s small reference
points. He and a team of students created art installations containing
outsized arrangements of natural and constructed objects that could
bring on a blanking of the mind. (These can be seen in the film Discovering Elegance.)
In the path of dharma art, the worldly and the spiritual completely
intermingled, and became in his words “an atomic bomb you carry in your
mind.”
|